LAUNCHING 2026
The Failure Fund is coming. Permission to experiment. Freedom to fall on your face.
$5,000 annual budget for beautiful experiments that might totally fail. Members pitch wild ideas. Community votes on which to fund. No expectation of success. We document and celebrate failures because innovation requires risk-taking and the freedom to fall on your face.
Most organizations only fund things that will succeed. We fund things that might spectacularly fail—and that's the point.
Every breakthrough starts with someone trying something that might not work. But when everything has to succeed, we only do safe things. We stop experimenting. We stop innovating. We get boring.
The Failure Fund is permission to try the weird idea. The thing you think might be amazing but you're not sure. The experiment that could either be brilliant or crash spectacularly.
When something fails, we don't hide it. We document it. We share it. We learn from it publicly. We throw a "Beautiful Failures" party at the end of the year and toast the experiments that didn't work out.
Because failure is data. Failure teaches us what doesn't work so we can figure out what does. Failure is valuable.
Members pitch ideas. Community votes. The experiment with the most votes gets funded—even if the board thinks it's ridiculous. Especially if the board thinks it's ridiculous.
This keeps ZAI weird, experimental, and responsive to what the community actually wants to try.
Literally anything. If it's weird, experimental, and might not work—it's perfect for the Failure Fund.
The Idea: Lock 10 artists in the gallery for 24 hours. They create art non-stop. Community watches via livestream. Public unveiling at the end.
Why It Might Fail: Artists get exhausted. Art might be terrible. Nobody watches the livestream. Everyone argues and storms out at hour 6.
Why We'd Fund It Anyway: We'd learn SO much about creative endurance, community engagement, and what happens when you push artists past normal limits.
The Idea: Actors perform a play. Audience members wear headphones with different audio tracks—some hear comedy, some hear tragedy, some hear experimental noise.
Why It Might Fail: Technically complex. Audience might hate it. Actors might find it impossible to perform to fragmented audiences.
Why We'd Fund It Anyway: It's genuinely never been done. Could revolutionize how we think about shared vs. individual theatrical experience.
The Idea: Local artists create 100 small pieces. Each costs $10. When someone buys one, they get a random piece—could be by a famous regional artist or a complete unknown.
Why It Might Fail: Nobody wants to gamble on art. Famous artists refuse to participate. Legal issues with "lottery."
Why We'd Fund It Anyway: Democratizes art collection. Makes it exciting and accessible. Could totally change how people buy local art.
Any ZU Arts Initiative member can submit a Failure Fund proposal. It should be:
Submit proposals between January-March each year.
All proposals are shared with the membership. Every member gets one vote. The idea with the most votes wins funding—no board veto power.
Voting happens in April. Winner announced at the Spring Member Assembly.
The winning idea gets $5,000 and 6 months to execute. The proposer documents the process:
Whether the experiment succeeds or fails, we share everything:
Success or failure doesn't matter. Learning is the only metric that counts.
The Failure Fund launches in 2026. Start thinking about your beautiful experiment now. What would you try if you knew you couldn't fail? Now flip it: What would you try if failure was perfectly acceptable?
Questions? Email grow@cortezarts.org